شناسایی آسیب‌ها و تهدیدهای موثر بر مدیریت علم دانشگاه (مورد مطالعه دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش‌آموخته دکتری مدیریت آموزش عالی، واحد تهران شمال، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران. تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار، برنامه‌ریزی درسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجایی. تهران، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه و هدف: امروزه واژه تولید علم در ادبیات کشور جایگاه ویژه ای پیدا کرده است. هدف از تحقیق حاضر شناسایی آسیب ها و تهدیدهای موثر برمدیریت علم دانشگاه بود.
روش شناسی پژوهش: این پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی، از نظر شیوه گردآوری اطلاعات، توصیفی‌- پیمایشی و از نظر ماهیت داده‌ها "آمیخته" از نوع اکتشافی انجام شده است. در بخش کیفی از تعداد 17 نفر از اعضاء هیات علمی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی از طریق نمونه گیری هدفمند و با استفاده از روش گلوله برفی تا مرز اشباع نظری مطالعه به عمل آمده و داده­ها  با استفاده از مصاحبه عمیق و نیمه ساختار یافته جمع­آوری شد. برای روایی بخش کیفی از مثلث­‌سازی منابع داده‌­ها برای غلبه بر سوگیریهای ذاتی ناشی از به­‌کار­گرفتن یک منبع در مطالعات استفاده شد. برای تعیین پایایی، روش پایایی توافق میان دو کدگذار به­‌کارگرفته شد و تحلیل داده­ها با روش تحلیل محتوای استقرایی با استفاده از کدگذاری در سه سطح باز، محوری و انتخابی انجام شد. در بخش کمی ابزار پژوهش پرسشنامه بودکه از تعداد 514 نفر از اساتید و اعضاء هیات علمی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی با روش نمونه گیری خوشه‌ای مطالعه به عمل آمد. روایی پرسشنامه­ از طریق روایی محتوا (نظر اعضای مصاحبه شونده و صاحب نظران) و روایی سازه (با استفاده از تحلیل عاملی تاییدی) انجام شد. بعد کمی با استفاده از نرم افزار Smart PLS و در قالب روش مدل­سازی معادلات ساختاری (تحلیل عاملی) انجام شده است.
یافته ­ها: نتایج مطالعه کیفی نشان داد شاخص­های؛ سیاست­های ساختاری و مدیریتی، محیط آموزشی، محیط ارتباطی، محیط حقوقی و محیط فکری و انگیزشی جز ابعاد و نشانگرهای مربوط به بعد شناخت آسیب­ها و شاخص­های؛ شرایط زمینه­ای (محیط نزدیک) و شرایط مداخله گرها (محیط دور) جز ابعاد و نشانگرهای مربوط به بعد شناخت تهدیدها می باشند.
بحث و نتیجه ­گیری: آسیب­ها و تهدیدهای داخلی تولید علم قابلیت تحلیل و پیش­بینی بیشتری نسبت به تهدیدات خارجی دارند و برای مدیریت علم ابتدا می بایست این آسیب­ها مورد توجه قرار گیرند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Identify the Vulnerability and Threats Affecting University Science Management (Case study of Islamic Azad University)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Heidar Ahmadi 1
  • Mohammad Reza Keramati 2
  • Gholam Ali Ahmadi 3
1 PhD Student in Higher Education Management, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Management and Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran Iran
3 Associate Professor, Curriculum Planning, Faculty of Humanities, Shahid Rajaei University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: The aim of this study was to identify the Vulnerability and threats affecting science management policy in the university.
research methodology: The research approach is applied in terms of purpose. Research information was collected by descriptive-survey method. The research is a "mixed method" and exploratory. Participants in this study were 17 faculty members of Islamic Azad University. Participants were selected by purposive method using snowball sampling method up to the theoretical saturation limit.  Qualitative data analysis was performed by inductive content analysis using coding at three levels: open, axial and selective. In the quantitative part, using Cochran's formula, 514 professors and faculty members of the Islamic Azad University were studied by "cluster" sampling method. Quantitative data analysis was performed using Smart PLS software in the form of structural equation modeling (factor analysis).
Findings: Based on the results, the Structural and managerial policies, educational environment, communication environment, legal environment and intellectual and motivational environment indicators were related to recognizing Vulnerability. Indicators Contextual conditions (close environment) and intervening conditions (remote environment) were related to recognizing threats.
Conclusion: Five components of structural and managerial policies, communication environment, legal environment and intellectual and motivational environment were identified as effective damages on university science management.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Vulnerability
  • Threats
  • Science Management
  • University
  1. Ahmadian Diokti, Mohammad Mehdi; Aghajani, Hassan Ali; Shirkhodaei, Meysam and Tehranchannian, Amir Mansour. (2018). Designing a science and technology policy model based on the economic complexity approach. Public Policy Quarterly. Volume 4, Number 4, winter 1397, pp. 9-27. [In Persian].
  2. Andrade, H. B; Lopez, E. R; Martin, T. B (2009). Dimension of scientific collaboration and its contribution to academic research groups scientific quality. Research Evaluation. Volume 18, Issue 4, October 2009, pp. 301–311.
  3. Arvanitis, R. (2011). Assessment of international scientific cooperation in Mediterranean region: an international challenge ahead. Beirut: MIRA. Mediterranean Research and Innovation partnership. B No. 71, 2013, pp. 105–131.
  4. Ball, Rafael. (2018). the Scholarly Communication of the Future: From Book Information to Problem Solving. Publishing Research Quarterly. Volume1, Number 27, pp. 1-12.
  5. Barzgar, Nader, Ghorchian, Nadergholi, Taghi Pourzahir, Ali. (2019). Vulnerability of Creating Innovation Capacities in Iranian University Management (Case: Islamic Azad University). Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration. Year 10, Number 1, spring 2019, pp. 291-310. [In Persian].
  6. Cheshmeh Sohrabi, Mozaffar and Mir Mohammadi, Somayeh (2014). ISI Articles of Iranian Scholars: Opportunity or Threat? The first national conference on science assessment. Esfahan, June 2014. [In Persian].
  7. Fadaei, Samad. Niaz Azari, Kiomars & Taqvaee Yazdi Maryam. (2018). Presenting a model for creating an entrepreneurial university based on futuristic techniques and science production in the educational system. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration. Year 8, Number 4, winter 2014, pp 1-18. [In Persian].
  8. Golmakani, Ibrahim; Nabavi, Seyed Hamid and Ahmadpour, Shahriyar. (2013). the Vulnerability of Academic Research: The Missing Ring of Science to Technology. Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences. Volume 5 Number 4, pp. 905-909. [In Persian].
  9. HabibyBadrabadi M, moghadam U. (2010). Theoretical model explaining the motivational programs in knowledge-based organizations. Development Resource Management and Support. 2010. Volume 6 Number 22, pp. 36-47. [In Persian].
  10. Hadavand, Saeed. (2010). the country's research challenges and its impact on elite migration. Journal of Tadbir. No. 216 May 2010.pp. 42-48. [In Persian].
  11. Hart, P., & Vromen, H. (2008). A New Era for Think Tanks in Public Policy? International Trends, Australian Realities, the Australian Journal of Public Administration, Volume 2, Number 67. pp. 135-148.
  12. Hemmings, B, & Kay, R. (2010). Research self-efficacy, ublication output, and early career development. International Journal of Educational Management. Volume 7, Number 27 September 2010. pp. 562-574
  13. Inactive Defense Organization. (2016). Passive defense at a glance. http://vru.ac.ir/my_doc/rafsanjan/book/pedafand.pdf
  14. Jafarzadeh, Rashid and Jalali Dizaji, Ali. (2015). A Study of Scientific Cooperation of Tabriz University with Foreign Countries in Scopus Citation Database Quarterly Journal of Science. Volume 8, Number 31. pp. 19-30. [In Persian].
  15. Jason E. Strakes.(2009). Institutional Effectiveness, Socio- Political Instability and Militatry Spending in Developing Nations: A Model of Internal Threat: School of Politics and Economics Claremont Graduate University, pp.1-5.
  16. Joo DL, Ahn D, Hyeon J. (2007). Reward systems for intra organizational knowledge sharing. European Journal of Operational Research. Number 180. 2007. Pp. 38-56.
  17. Karimian Zahra; Sabbaghian, Zahra and Saleh Sadeghpour, Bahram (2011). Investigating the barriers and challenges of research and production of science in medical universities. Bi-Quarterly of the Iranian Higher Education Association. Volume 3, Number 4. pp. 1-23. [In Persian].
  18. Kwok S, Gao S. (2004). Knowledge sharing community in p2p networks: a study of motivational perspective. Journal of knowledge management. 2004; 18(1). pp. 94-102
  19. Lauriden B, Cruz A. (2013). Knowledge sharing and problem - based learning. Proceedings of ASBBS. 2013; 20(1). pp. 423-35.
  20. Mohseni Tabrizi, Alireza; Ghazi Tabatabai, Mahmoud; Marjani, Mahmood. (2010). the Impact of Scientific Environment Issues and Challenges on Academic Socialization. Journal of Research and Planning in Education. Volume 1, Number 16. pp. 27-52. [In Persian].
  21. Norouzi, Abbas Ali; Abolghasemi, Mahmoud and Qahramani, Mohammad. (2012). Science production strategy based on the analysis of organizational and managerial structures of universities. Strategic Management Studies, . Volume 3, Number 12. pp. 123-143. [In Persian].
  22. Osareh, F (2005). Higher education research collaboration between Iran & UK held in COLLINET meeting extra session in conjuction with 10th ISSI Conference, 28th ـJuly in Stockholm-Sweden.
  23. Panjehpour, Mojtaba. (2018). Analytical study of research pathology in the country. Andisheh scroll site. 2018. Volume 2, Number 4. pp. 1-12. [In Persian].
  24. Passive Defense Organization. (2015). Passive defense at a glance. http://vru.ac.ir/my_doc/rafsanjan/book/pedafand.pdf
  25. Samari, Eysa; Yemeni Douzi Sorkhabi, Mohammad; Salehi Omran, Ibrahim and Garainejad, Gholamreza. (2013). Investigation and identification of effective factors in the process of "university development" in Iranian public universities. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Educational Planning Studies. Volume 6, Number 13. pp. 25-32. [In Persian].
  26. Shah Nazarnejad Khalesi, Zahra and Safari Rad, Fatemeh. (2018). A review of scientific publications in the field of scientific communication indexed in the Islamic World Science Citation Database (ISC). The Second National Conference of the Iranian Library and Information Association - Fars Branch, Prospects for Scientific Communication. May 10, 2018 Shiraz. [In Persian].
  27. Taghizadeh Kermani, Nafiseh; Hossein Gholizadeh, Rezvan and Javidi, Tahereh. (1394). Pathology of knowledge production in humanities research nuclei. Journal of Culture Strategy. Volume 1, Number 30. pp. 1-17. [In Persian].